Care for breast cancer survivors in Asian countries: A review of sexual dysfunction.

Breast cancer accounts for one in three new cancer cases in women each year. Despite having a higher survival rate than other cancers, it is associated with various side effects, including anorgasmia, vaginismus, hair loss, and decreased libido. This review aims to explore trends in the incidence of sexual dysfunction in breast cancer survivors, the etiology of sexual dysfunction, and the role of factors such as family history, age, duration of marriage, and depression in predisposing patients. We summarize the limitations of the treatment modalities already used to cater to sexual dysfunction in breast cancer survivors and patients. The authors conducted searches on databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar using relevant search terms: sexual dysfunction, breast cancer, breast cancer survivors, chemotherapy, dyspareunia, vaginismus, and anorgasmia from 1997-2023. The inclusion criteria encompassed all types of articles with abstracts or titles indicating research on sexual dysfunction in breast cancer survivors in Asia. A total of 64 articles were included out of which 10 were systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The literature search yielded results showing high incidence rates of breast cancer in Asia (45.4%), with 31.6%-91.2% of breast cancer survivors likely to experience sexual dysfunction. Regional differences were noted, as female sexual dysfunction occurred in 74.1% of Asian breast cancer women. Further randomized controlled trials should be conducted to assess the effectiveness of treatment modalities. Personalized approaches should be tailored to address beliefs, such as the potential impact of sexual activity on disease recovery. Utilizing a family history of breast cancer as a preemptive tool can help reduce the risk of developing female sexual dysfunction in survivors, and factors such as age and depression should be considered when formulating solutions.

How well does the virtual format of oncology multidisciplinary team meetings work? An assessment of participants' perspectives and limitations: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Virtual multidisciplinary team meetings (VMDTM) provide a standard of care that is not limited by physical distance or social restrictions. And so, when the COVID-19 pandemic imposed irrefutable social restrictions and made in-person meetings impossible, many hospitals switched to the VMDTMs. Although the pandemic might have highlighted the ease of VMDTMs, these virtual meetings have existed over the past decade, albeit less in importance. Despite their recent importance, no review has previously assessed the feasibility of VMDTMs through the eyes of the participants, the barriers participants face, nor their comparison with the in-person format. We undertook this scoping review to map existing literature and assess the perspectives of VMDTM participants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Google Scholar from inception till July 1st, 2023 to select studies that evaluated the perspectives of participants of VMDTMs regarding the core components that make up a VMDMT. Four authors, independently, extracted data from all included studies. Two authors separated data into major themes and sub-themes. RESULTS: We identified six core, intrinsic aspects of a VMDTM that are essential to its structure: (1) organization, (2) case discussion and decision-making, (3) teamwork and communication, (4) training and education, (5) technology, and (6) patient-related aspect. VMDTMs have a high overall satisfaction rating amongst participants. The preference, however, is for a hybrid model of multidisciplinary teams. VMDTMs offer support to isolated physicians, help address complex cases, and offer information that may not be available elsewhere. The periodical nature of VMDTMs is appropriate for their consideration as CMEs. Adequate technology is paramount to the sustenance of the format. CONCLUSION: VMDTMs are efficient and offer a multidisciplinary consensus without geographical limitations. Despite certain technical and social limitations, VMDTM participants are highly satisfied with the format, although the preference lies with a hybrid model.

Briumvi: a breakthrough in the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis: a review.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by plaques of demyelination, autoimmune inflammation, and astrocytic gliosis. The primary cells involved in the pathophysiology of MS are T cells. However, B cells have recently been implicated in the pathophysiology of the disease. Therefore, researchers have been exploring B cell therapy as an alternative treatment option for MS. B cell therapy is based on the targeted depletion of CD20-positive B cells. Rituximab, ocrelizumab, and ofatumumab are anti-CD20 antibodies already approved. Briumvi, the fourth type of anti-CD20 antibody was approved by FDA in December 2022, for the treatment of relapsing types of MS, including relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, active secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, and clinically isolated syndromes after the drug was tested in two randomized, double-blind, phase III, ULTIMATE I, and II trials which compared Briumvi (ublituximab) with Aubiago (teriflunomide). Ublituximab was found to have a much lower annual relapse rate in the ULTIMATE II trials than teriflunomide. Briumvi is a chimeric recombinant IgG1 monoclonal antibody directed against human CD20 with potential antineoplastic activity. Its mechanism of action involves several distinct processes that collectively lead to the depletion of B cells and suppression of the immune response. The primary mode of action of Briumvi is its high-affinity binding to CD20. Infusion-related reactions are the most common side effects encountered following intravenous administration of ublituximab.